| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126 | 
							- syntax = "proto3";
 
- // These proto descriptors have at one time been reported as an issue or defect.
 
- // They are kept here to replicate the issue, and continue to verify the fix.
 
- // Issue: Non-"Google.Protobuffers" namespace will ensure that protobuffer library types are qualified
 
- option csharp_namespace = "UnitTest.Issues.TestProtos";
 
- package unittest_issues;
 
- option optimize_for = SPEED;
 
- // Issue 307: when generating doubly-nested types, any references
 
- // should be of the form A.Types.B.Types.C.
 
- message Issue307 {
 
-   message NestedOnce {
 
-     message NestedTwice {
 
-     }
 
-   }
 
- }
 
- // Old issue 13: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=13
 
- // New issue 309: https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/309
 
-  
 
- // message A {
 
- //    optional int32 _A = 1;
 
- // }
 
- // message B {
 
- //    optional int32 B_ = 1;
 
- // }
 
- //message AB {
 
- //    optional int32 a_b = 1;
 
- //}
 
- // Similar issue with numeric names
 
- // Java code failed too, so probably best for this to be a restriction.
 
- // See https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/308
 
- // message NumberField {
 
- //    optional int32 _01 = 1;
 
- // }
 
- // issue 19 - negative enum values
 
- enum NegativeEnum {
 
-     NEGATIVE_ENUM_ZERO = 0;
 
-     FiveBelow = -5;
 
-     MinusOne = -1;
 
- }
 
- message NegativeEnumMessage {
 
-     NegativeEnum value = 1;
 
-     repeated NegativeEnum values = 2 [packed = false];
 
-     repeated NegativeEnum packed_values = 3 [packed=true];
 
- }
 
- // Issue 21: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=21
 
- // Decorate fields with [deprecated=true] as [System.Obsolete]
 
- message DeprecatedChild {
 
- }
 
- enum DeprecatedEnum {
 
-     DEPRECATED_ZERO = 0;
 
-     one = 1;
 
- }
 
- message DeprecatedFieldsMessage {
 
-     int32 PrimitiveValue = 1 [deprecated = true];
 
-     repeated int32 PrimitiveArray = 2 [deprecated = true];
 
-     DeprecatedChild MessageValue = 3 [deprecated = true];
 
-     repeated DeprecatedChild MessageArray = 4 [deprecated = true];
 
-     DeprecatedEnum EnumValue = 5 [deprecated = true];
 
-     repeated DeprecatedEnum EnumArray = 6 [deprecated = true];
 
- }
 
- // Issue 45: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=45
 
- message ItemField {
 
-   int32 item = 1;
 
- }
 
- message ReservedNames {
 
-   // Force a nested type called Types
 
-   message SomeNestedType {
 
-   }
 
-   int32 types = 1;
 
-   int32 descriptor = 2;
 
- }
 
- message TestJsonFieldOrdering {
 
-   // These fields are deliberately not declared in numeric
 
-   // order, and the oneof fields aren't contiguous either.
 
-   // This allows for reasonably robust tests of JSON output
 
-   // ordering.
 
-   // TestFieldOrderings in unittest_proto3.proto is similar,
 
-   // but doesn't include oneofs.
 
-   // TODO: Consider adding oneofs to TestFieldOrderings, although
 
-   // that will require fixing other tests in multiple platforms.
 
-   // Alternatively, consider just adding this to
 
-   // unittest_proto3.proto if multiple platforms want it.
 
-   
 
-   int32 plain_int32 = 4;
 
-   oneof o1 {
 
-     string o1_string = 2;
 
-     int32 o1_int32 = 5;
 
-   }
 
-   
 
-   string plain_string = 1;
 
-   
 
-   oneof o2 {
 
-     int32 o2_int32 = 6;
 
-     string o2_string = 3;
 
-   }
 
-   
 
- }
 
- message TestJsonName {
 
-   // Message for testing the effects for of the json_name option
 
-   string name = 1;
 
-   string description = 2 [json_name = "desc"];
 
-   string guid = 3 [json_name = "exid"];
 
- }
 
 
  |